by Jonathon Blakeley
23/10/2011
The UK’s response to the British riots was typical predictable and hypocritical. Whilst happy to encourage popular revolution through explicit and covert means in Syria, Eygpt or Lybia, they are much less happy to think that there could be a people’s revolution in the UK plc. Good Lord no! Thus the rioters were condemned vehemently as scum-bag chav criminals, and treated with full force of the law. Just to be on the “safe” side so as to prevent any form of dissent emerging in the first place, the police via ACPO have infiltrated many layers of society with their own secret police and agent provocateurs. Waiting for the first sniff of criminality to capture & or encourage any dissidents and then criminalise them punitively.
And so it is we are seeing a long list of people that have been turned into criminals, for their beliefs and ideas, not for crimes. People often young men and women given ridiculously large prison sentences for trivial crimes. Stealing a bottle of water – 6 months.
- Charlie Gilmour – 16 months for swinging on a flag.
- Julian Assange for what..? We still don’t know; Rumour and innuendo.
- Jake Davis of Lulzsec for alleged hacktivist activities including website graffiti,
- Gary McKinnon for alleged hacking and downloading of UFO images.
- Bradley Manning Biggest Data leak ever on Lady GaGa Cd’s.
Hackers are the new terrorists
The new thing that is emerging now is how we are seeing hackers being portrayed as terrorists or murderers. Acts carried out on computers have become comparable with acts of extreme violence. People who risk protest are being criminalised, people who protest in the streets are beaten and pepper sprayed, whilst people who protest with computers are declared cyber terrorists.
So Jake Davis; could face 10 years for bringing down a website for a short while. It seems ludicrous; no one was hurt, injured or died. Yet Julian Assange, Jake Davis, Gary McKinnon, all could get a sentences longer than someone on a manslaughter charge.
Following the information leak from Wikileaks the Penta-Con made a big argument about how the security of agents may be compromised and those agents could have their lives put at risk. Lol. Big deal a few CIA moles may be rumbled in their Machiavellian schemes. Good! Its not like they were targeted for assassination by armed drones.
The first step was when animal right protesters were declared as terrorists. Since then we have seen more and more groups similarly demonised. UK Uncut is another that has being portrayed this way.
The real war is for IDEAS
But that doesn’t stop the Elite from trying to stamp ideas out. You can not arrest an idea; but you can make discussion of an idea illegal in some countries. These days this amounts to people telling you what books you can and can not read. If ignorance really is the root of all evil then encouraging others to ignorance seems like madness magnified. The sad fact of the matter is they; the ruling elite and their enforcers, are losing the battle for our “hearts and minds”. The started losing it long ago, and with every new revelation of corruption and complicity the despair in the people grows ever greater. The mismatch between Truth and the Reality they push on us has grown wider and wider. In creating the war on Terror the first task was and still is to control the Language and the media and then everyone else.
Through the media in its many forms we hear of
- Terrorists
- Enemy combatants
- Insurgents
- Radicals
- Taliban
- Islamic Fundamentalist
- Revolutionary fighters
- Cyber terrorists
- Digital Terrorists
- Islamification
- Radicalisation
All these words have something in common what is it? A massive emotional effect and are often used to program and denounce & defame people.
The cone of silence
But who are the Elite? The Elite are small collection of individuals some have extreme wealth, some knowledge, some power. Together they rule this planet with little trouble from us at all.
Any one resisting current programming is quickly rooted out in scenes not unlike Invader of the Body Snatchers.
Anonymous for the rich
At Occupy London Protests Julian Assange commented -
Even anonymity it seems has become the domain of the uber rich with their swiss bank accounts. He himself was arrested temporarily over him wearing a Guy Fawkes Anonymous mask. So it is ok for the Rich to hide away in the reclusive retreats and offshore bank account and swiss bank accounts, but for the rest of us, our every move is scrutinised by Intelligence agencies looking for the slightest signs of dissent, & dangerous patterns of behaviour amidst the internet chatter. With this has come a kind of internal censoring by many. We know that Echelon is always listening so we avoid dangerous words and websites for fear of bringing the automatic Echelon system to focus upon one self. Eventually even a real human sigint (Signal Intelligence) operator at 8200 Herzliya Israel, GCHQ Cheltenham/Bude UK or the NSA Maryland USA, might scrutinise my data-trail.
And so I dedicate this post to the SIGINT people who may monitor this data. -
You may just be following orders and doing your Job, just because you are unaware of what happens above you in higher rings of secrecy, does not free you from ethical responsibility. If all the SIGINT people rebelled against Echelon and the Cabal that controls it our world would be a better place. The myth of protecting us all from unseen dangers in just a paranoic meme to gain your trust.
People self censor, encrypt or use code in order to protect one’s online identity. And so the education programs keep reaching out through websites, think tanks and schools. Informing us what to read what not to read, educating us brainwashing us.
If hackers are the new terrorists and hackers generally use computers to test security and steal data at worst, what does that make people who use computers to kill and rape as in some computer games? So are hackers really the new terrorists? Linked-in want us to think so.
http://www.linkedin.com/answers/law-legal/criminal-law/LAW_CLW/846157-13251370
Cyberterrorists?
Are they really? Where is the moral equivalence between a suicide bomber and Julian Assange and his Wikileaks website. Julian Assange is not trying to kill anyone. Quite the opposite, to try to paint him as such only reveals more clearly who the enemy in our midst really is. Are hackers really the new terrorists or are they the Cyber freedom fighters?
